© Copyright
1998 Michael Eigen This paper is available online at DSPP
with the kind permission of Michael Eigen. The author may be
reached at Mikeigen@aol.com
The
Psychoanalytic Mystic
Chapter 7
PERCHANCE TO DREAM
Michael Eigen, Ph.
D.

Saint Augustine opens the Bible and
wherever his eyes fall are words God means for him this moment, this crossroad. These are
destiny words. They give Saint Augustine courage and direction. It is time for him to go
all the way, to give his life to God. He looks for a sign. Wherever the Bible opens,
wherever eyes fall--chance is destiny.
The Hebrew purim means
"lots." The Book of Esther tells how lots were cast to see which Jews
lived or died. Behind the lots was the evil will of a man called Haman. The good and
cunning Mordecai sent his adopted daughter, Esther, to seduce the king, Achashverus, to
reverse the decree. Beautiful and wise Esther did the trick, not on her own, but with help
of a dream the king had about the help Mordecai once gave him. The dream pricked the
conscience of the king, but it didn't hurt that Esther sweetened the prick. The book is
about the work of reversal, since Haman hung on his own gallows and many of his followers
(perhaps many innocents) were killed. Chai means life, which encompasses lots and
reversals.
Alan Watts used to shoot arrows in the air
above his head. It was exhilarating for him to see if he would live or die. As chance had
it, no arrow pierced him. He had to drink himself to death.
And what of those who play Russian
roulette? Who lives, who dies? There are so many roulettes in life--disease, accidents,
violence. I think of people I've known from childhood who are no longer here. I'm amazed
I'm still here. It feels like borrowed time. I still have my little chance at living. By
this time it fells like I've had many, many chances.
Going to School
I'm driving one of my boys to school. We
pause at an intersection while a car crosses in front of us and slows down. A teenager
sticks his head out the window and pukes. My boy and I were chatting aimlessly,
pleasantly. I try to make light of the puking but I'm aware my son has a hard time with
vomit. The day changes. He feels queasy.
"Oh, no!" I think. "Shit!
Just when things were gong nicely!"
The thought crosses my mind that this
chance act is a cosmic message. The cosmos knows my son has a nervous stomach, has
struggled with intestinal difficulties for many years. We feared he might develop Crone's
disease or colitis or something worse. So far nothing of the sort happened. The fears were
magnified dreads of parental minds. He has gotten much better.
The cosmos rubs it in. It finds/creates a
weakness and milks it for all its worth, a kind of black humor cosmos. It keeps testing,
creating challenges, forcing growth for those who can grow. But what of those who
can't take it? Inwardly I'm moaning, "Why the hell did this have to happen now?"
I watch my son out of the corner of my eye.
He doesn't complain but I see his face turning yellowish-greenish. He takes a couple of
Tums. He hasn't eaten breakfast. I stupidly suggest he have some toast he took along, he
oughtn't to got to school on an empty stomach or he won't feel well later. He looks at me
as if I were a Martian and reminds me (as if I needed reminding), "I don't fell well
now." The wry humor in his voice reassures me and I let go inwardly. He has tuned
into the cosmic wink. It is all beyond me. He is moving along his own trajectory with its
blessings and curses. I smile back with wry appreciation. Aspects of my life and
personality dance in inner vision--no great shakes. His mess isn't any worse than mine.
Who can measure? As it turns out, he has a good day. And so do I.
The Pain Machine
My mother is in her mid-eighties and her
mental functions are not what they used to be. She has short tem memory problems and
easily panics when things do not go right. This means she forgets a lot and panics a lot.
She lives alone in the house I grew up in and I wonder how long she can do this. She does
not want outside help and does not want to move. All her friends are gone. The
neighborhood has changed. The small world she lived in is gone. Yet she stays on in the
old house that is so small and fragile now, but which was huge and solid when I was a
child.
I get a lot of panic calls. Things are
always going wrong. The furnace stops working, circuit breakers shut off, a next door
neighbor encroaches on her property. All these things happen and need attention. Last
month smoke was coming from the circuit breaker box, and if the electrician delayed a few
hours, the house would have burned down.
But she also calls when nothing is wrong or
when what is wrong is trivial. She does not just call me. She calls repair men, the
electrician, the heating company, helpful neighbors. She generates a support network,
although her calls can be maddening. A few weeks ago, panicky about heater and
electricity, she called the heating company twenty times in one evening. They finally sent
a repair man to adjust her thermostat. She could not adjust it herself. Her eyes can't see
the numbers. It was set too high and she was too terrified to turn it down a bit.
Some of her calls are dreamlike,
nightmarish. She talks slowly, haltingly, like she walks. She has trouble finding words.
Since my mind is much faster, I jump to conclusions, fill in blanks. A recent phone
conversation went something like this:
"You know, everyone has one. You have
one."
"What mom? What do I have?"
"You know--a machine."
"You mean a furnace?"
"No--a pain-machine."
"A pain machine?"
"A man comes and sets it
at
night. You have one. He sets it for me. But he didn't come tonight."
"A man comes every night? A man comes
and sets a machine? A man comes and sets a pain machine? Something to make you feel
better?"
"You know what I mean
You have
one."
She mentions time. I imagine she's
talking about a pain machine that's a time machine. I start getting into it and locate my
own pain machine in the center of my chest. Then I come to and think, "This is it.
She's lost it." I tell my wife and think of places to bring her, and settle on a
really good hospital, although it is a very long drive. My wife suggests I call again to
check things out and see how she's doing.
Almost as soon as I call she blurts out,
"The timer. That' s the name. Timer--for the lights." In an instant it becomes
clear. She kept calling the timer a machine. She said time a few times but I didn't know
she meant timer. The automatic light timer was thrown off when the electricity was shut
off. A man was to reset the timer, but did not show up. She was disturbed that lights were
going on and off at wrong times. When I asked about the word "pain," she said it
was a pain, she couldn't think of the word "timer" and communicate what she
meant.
I felt enormously relieved and so did she.
"I was worried, mom. I thought you lost it." "I was worried, too, "
she said. We both feared she'd gone over the edge. After this experience, she became
stronger and clearer for a week or two.
I filled in my mother's blanks with
psychotic vision. A pain machine--that's pretty good. As good as an influencing machine. I
really saw it. I think of how I had to slow down when my children were very little. It
could take hours to walk a block. They would play with a swinging gate for twenty minutes,
wander up and down stoops, walk on walls, be attracted by this or that object or color or
movement. If I dropped into their time world it was like being high. The play of chance
opened worlds of possibilities.
With my poor mother, it was the opposite.
Chance destroyed. Her world was populated with broken machines, invading neighbors, bad
weather, threat of violence. Every chance event threatened loss of control, reduced her to
helpless panic. Her powers of organization were slipping and what attracted her were
symbols of her mental and physical inability to work. Where chance once meant opportunity,
it now meant disability and the coming end. Chance once stimulated life and the building
of structure. Now it poured vinegar into wounds of breakdown and deterioration. How sweet
moments of intactness can be--when things come together for awhile, a breath of air,
neither stupor nor panic. All the sweeter, as they become fewer and fewer.
Mousemare
A supervisee chats about a patient who
chats a lot about boyfriends and sex. She loves sex and talks about which boyfriend makes
her feel better how. Her mother does not care for her men and lifestyle. She fears her
daughter will not make much of her life. She's fucking her life away. She, too, fucked her
life away, but, at least, has a daughter to show for it. Her father was warmer and nicer
but died. She worries, like her mother, about what will become of her. But she is having
fun.
Fun, that is, up to a point. She feels the
men she dates are beneath her. They are not her equals. Good in bed, not stimulating
otherwise. She feels too inadequate to meet men she can talk with. She's afraid of men she
can talk with. She is comfortable with sexy men who don't say much.
She tells her therapist how happy she is
that her new boyfriend talks with her and that she likes talking with him. He's a bit
stuffy in bed, not as good as her usual lovers. He washes himself off too quickly and is
hesitant about mucousy things. But he makes up for it by mothering her. He tucks her in,
cuddles, cooks for her, buys her presents. She's never felt so well taken care of.
In passing, she mentions a nightmare she
had while sleeping with him. In the nightmare mice were all over the place, even in their
bed. Did she get bitten? Will she get bitten? Are they growing in size and number? She was
terrified.
She made light of her passing panic. She
wanted to keep talking about boyfriends and sex. This one was good this way, that one that
way. If only she could find one that combined the best of all worlds. She didn't want to
break up with the mothering and talking one. He wasn't exactly bad in bed. It's just that
he wasn't as into it as she really liked, but
and so on, and on.
The nightmare gets lost, dismissed, passed
by. Her therapist didn't say a word about it. She got involved with the verbal flow, the
boyfriend, the family stories, the daily ups and downs. The patient tries to make little
of her nightmare, her panic. She tries to make terror into a little, fleeting mousy thing.
But terror grows in intensity (size and number), until it has to be noticed. It demands an
awakening of sorts.
I was sitting and waiting and letting the
chat wash over but felt a rush when the terror of the night passed by. Something in me
said, "Hold it. Wait a minute. Run that one again." I opened my mouth and out
came the words, "The mousemare. But the mousemare--you said nothing about it!"
My supervisee gave me a funny look, not
without interest. "Here she's telling you how comforting her boyfriend is, how
soothing," I go on. "She's never been so well cared for. And she wakes up
screaming. Terror wakes her. His motherly arms enfold her, and she wakes up in
panic."
I suppose we could have chatted about mice
as sexual symbol, fear of the very thing she loves. Or perhaps they have to do with her
mother's promiscuity, which must have frightened, as well as enticed her, as a child. Or
perhaps she feels so tiny in her boyfriend's arms, tiny and afraid of being biting or
bitten. Perhaps mice refer to the intensity of the baby self, too much for parents or
anyone to handle well. We could say she can't bear the safety of the boyfriend's care, or
that she finds it engulfing, suffocating. There are many things we could think or say. But
the emotional fact is terror. Whatever we say, it has terror as its nucleus.
And it is precisely this terror she
excludes from her chatty sessions and from her lovemaking. She is good at this exclusion,
because even her therapist doesn't notice. She runs the terror past her session, whisks it
away as soon as it is spoken. It is spoken but not heard.
It is not heard but is transmitted by my
supervisee's notes. When my supervisee mentions the mousemare in passing, suddenly I hear
nothing else. If the patient sees only sex and comfort, I see only terror. We are both
reductionists. The dream is spokesman for excluded terror. My supervisee will learn to be
spokesman for the dream.
Chance sexual meetings thrill this patient,
but her mousemare tries to give terror a chance. The waves of the dream need to travel a
distance before they have an impact. Isn't that, partly, what supervisors are for? Who
knows what dwelling with this terror may open? Perhaps the dream is asking to give the
unknown a chance.
A Horror Story
My patient, Max, is extraordinary. He has
an amazing ability to perceive structural relations in financial systems and develop
creative solutions for problems that might otherwise pass unnoticed and be destructive
later. He is, also, a mechanical whiz. He can fix anything around a house or a computer.
He is a master do-it-yourselfer, but runs into a wall when it comes to fixing himself.
His wife forced him into therapy because he
was high strung, rarely home, and rageful. She feared their son would grow up without a
father. If left to his own devices, he'd work all the time. To his credit, he found a
lovely wife who wanted more than a furious workaholic.
I find Max engaging, endearing, charming,
but I like eccentrics, especially brilliant ones. Nevertheless, his self-made-man rap
tends to be off putting, especially when it leads to denigrating others, like his wife and
co-workers, as weaker. His expectations are severe. He has to be the best and expects
others to be the best too (best=strong, independent, supercompetent). It galls him that
his wife, who watches more TV, sleeps more, needs down time, accesses a wider range of
feelings than he and can dream.
Max is not a therapy type, but he comes to
see me when a crisis hits because he now realizes he can be scary and that he scares
himself. He makes sounds and gestures in his sleep that scare his wife, but remembers no
dream. Then one session, in a recent trip through therapy, he comes in proudly, dangling
an enormous dream, the first dream in his adult life.
Max brags about a horror story dream, in
which he tells Stephen King that the latter's stories aren't scary. Max analyzes the
author's stories and proves they are too hackneyed to be truly frightening. The author,
with amused dismay, challenges Max to do better. Max rises to the challenges and creates a
story on the spot, that King agrees is really frightening.
The story is about a criminal who finds a
way to put doctors and nurses in a new-born baby ward out of play, then steals the babies
and sells them to drug and porno rings. As the police close in, he sells the remaining
babies as a group to the most evil ring of all.
So proud was Max of besting Stephen King
that he couldn't wait to tell the dream. He told a colleague at work who was horrified.
Max was so proud of his ability to create something scary, that he didn't realize it might
actually affect someone negatively. He expected people to rejoice in his triumph, rather
than recoil in horror.
"The dream is quite real," I
said. "It expresses very real feelings in your life. Doesn't it express your feelings
about being adopted?"
Max was an adopted child. The dream
magnified feelings of being ripped away, stolen, sold into bondage. He was given a home,
but at great expense. He was abused and neglected by his adopted mother, and his father
was rarely home. When his father was home, he spent his time fixing the house. Max watched
him and learned. Most of all he learned the lesson of doing things for himself, since no
one helped him. He was on his own and made the most of it.
Max flashed a look that said everything.
For the moment, he was gifted with inner vision. It was hard to believe feelings from so
long ago created a dream now. But he stared at the horror and hurt of it, if only for
instants. He couldn't believe the dream was not only about victory, but about injury--his
own. But he saw it with his own eyes and, for the first time, felt some connection to the
scary sounds that tore out of him in the night, sounds he never heard himself.
Jouissance
In
psychoanalysis, chance, to some extent, means repetition, the banana peel principle of
life. When I least expect it and feel in the clear, II'll slip on a mishap my
personality attracts, if not creates. A bad boss, a disastrous love object, my own
shortsighted reactive patterns and sudden bursts of cruelty, a calamity that mirrors my
damaged self--the sense that--oh-oh--here it comes again! Pow! Boom! Zap! Ouch!
How did I get myself into this jam again?
What seem to be chance events connect with
deep patterns laid down in infancy and early childhood. At the same time, I may seize on
chance events to break a pattern. I may do something destructive to escape a suffocating
existence, to get a thrill. It is often impossible to distinguish between chance as
repetition or breaking through repetition. It is more difficult than ordinarily imagined
to tell the difference between old and new.
Desires are repetitious. Whether the play
of Eros is capricious or linked to a soul mate, the experience and anatomy of desires have
a, b, c's. We can list desires associated with fame, romance, power, and finding out about
them for ourselves can be necessary fun. Some of us eventually develop maps of desires and
learn a lot about what to expect of them.
There are patients too dead to have
desires. Sometimes the appearance of desire means growth in aliveness. There are, also,
patients who are frightened by desires. They feel if they could live them out, they would
be cured. But there are others who live out all manner of desires, and still are
searching. They feel as enchained as liberated by demands of desire. In this regard, it is
worth noting that great literature of our past defines characters by their desires,
particularly characteristic limits of desires. There are sectors of literature today in
which characters are defined less by desire, than by extent of personality collapse or
deterioration or lack of development.
Lacan (1977) writes of desire as a defense,
a prohibition, a binding: For desire is a defense, a prohibition against going beyond a
certain limit in jouissance" (p. 322).
To modify this notion for my own use, if we
posit a primary or originary jouissance (bliss/joy/ecstasy/juiciness), systems of
desires function as paths or filters for the former. Let me follow my fantasy vision
further. Let us call God jouissance, then all God's creating of the cosmos, the
heavens, the earth, living beings - all creating is Jouissance. In one of its
faces, chance is Jouissance's freedom.
In Biblical stories, unbounded Jouissance
is annihilating. Can one see God and live? Dare one get too close to the Unbounded?
Aharon's sons are burnt to a crisp, trying to bypass protective limits. Chance, too, is a
filter, a sign, an opening. If one tries to bypass chance, and take an express to the
Source or Goal, life ends.
Desire is a protective limit, as is the
Law. For Lacan (1977) they go (grow) together: "The true function of the Father is to
unite (and not set in opposition) a desire and the Law" (p. 321). If there were only
originary Jouissance, there would be no place for creatures like us. We work with
oppositions and unities of desire and Law, the limiting poles or structures that make us
possible. Our identities are brakes and limits enabling living, and openings for the
originary creative joy that makes living worth it.
W. R. Bion somewhere wrote,
"Life is full of surprises. Most of them bad." But one senses jouissance
seeping through the not so hidden background of his rueful remark.
Eigen, M. (1998).
Perchance to dream. In, The Psychoanalytic Mystic (pp. 127-134).London,
UK::Free Association Books.
Dr Eigen is a
psychologist and psychoanalyst. Senior member, faculty and training analyst
National Psychological Association for Psychoanalysis. Associate
Clinical Professor of Psychology and supervisor, the New York University
Postdoctoral Program in Psychotherapy and Psychoanalysis. Member, American
Psychological Association.
© Copyright 1998 Michael Eigen This paper
is available online at DSPP with the kind permission of Michael
Eigen. Do not duplicate without permission. The
author may be reached at Mikeigen@aol.com
6/28/99
Want to purchase the book? Go
to The Psychoanalytic
Mystic
Return to
Home Page
Return to
Papers |