| October 1998
DALLAS SOCIETY FOR PSYCHOANALYTIC PSYCHOLOGY
B U L L E T I N
WHO'S AFRAID OF WILFRED BION?
with
Myrna Little, Ph.D.
Myrna Little, Ph.D., President Elect of DSPP, will
present the October program, Who's Afraid of Wilfred Bion?, the second in this
year's series on Finding and Being Found: Self and Other Through the Life Span. Bion
extended Freud's and Klein's theories through his own innovative thinking and is
considered today to be one of Britain's and Europe's most influential thinkers in
psychoanalysis. Together, we will address: 1) the context in which Bion evolved the model
of the mind; 2) his most central ideas; and 3) his contribution to contemporary analytic
work, particularly his concerns with technique. Dr. Little's presentation will be
discussed by Stephen Scherffius, M.D.
Dr. Little is currently wearing many hats for DSPP.
She is Chairman of the Program Committee, Division 39 Representative, and President Elect.
A psychologist in private practice in Dallas, she earned her Ph.D. at The University of
North Texas. Beginning her career as an operating room nurse, she later turned to a
stronger interest in the structure of the mind.
October Meeting
Date: Wednesday, October 14, 1998
Social Time: 7:00 PM
Presentation: 7:30 PM
Location: Pecan Creek Office Park
8340 Meadow Road
Speaker: Myrna Little, Ph.D.
Discussant: Stephen Scherffius, M.D.
Topic: Who's Afriad of Wilfred Bion?
THE MYTH OF THE GENERIC THERAPIST;
FINDING THE PATIENT AND BEING FOUND
At DSPP's September meeting, a large audience
relished the first program in the series: Finding and Being Found: Self and Other
Through the Life Span. Each member of the Program Committee participated in the
presentation: The Myth of the Generic Therapist: Finding the Patient and Being Found, a
roundtable discussion of the influence and importance of the "Two Person"
paradigm within psychoanalytic thought. The presenters offered their unique perspectives
on this paradigm, perspectives which ranged from scholarly to whimsical.
Myrna Little, Ph.D. began the discussion by noting
that the one person paradigm grew out of 19th century science based on logical
positivism. She described Freud as insisting upon the holy trinity of anonymity,
neutrality, and abstinence in order to avoid the contamination of suggestion. On the other
hand, the two-person paradigm has grown out of 20th century science emphasizing
relativity, participant observation, and uncertainty. Debate on the validity of these two
positions has created an epistemological crisis in psychoanalytic circles.
Denise Humphrey, M.M. posed the question of whether
or not a neutral analyst, "a silent, information processor posing as a person",
is a possibility. She noted that a scientific authority, which attempts to norm the
analytic encounter, is being questioned; the pendulum is swinging toward a relativistic
stance in the two-person model. However, she argued that the model has not as yet offered
a comprehensive paradigm. Perhaps, a combination of the one-person model and the
two-person model, while apparently threatening to proponents of either position, is the
best idea.
Malcolm Bonnheim, Ph.D., saying he has no problem
with the general idea of intersubjectivity, noted that each of us is peering out from a
subjective realm; psychotherapy is not generic but an interplay of the unique
subjectivities of the therapist and the patient. However, he observed that emotional
attunement and empathic inquiry have been features of psychoanalysis for a long time. In
addition, conflicts, internal representations, etc. can be described relatively
objectively. Wholesale throwing out of theories of development and technique is not wise.
Finally, Dr. Bonnheim questioned the position of proponents of intersubjectivity that no
true autonomy or aloneness can exist, saying that the highest form of intimacy depends on
loving the other for his or her differences, aloneness, and uniqueness.
Describing the intersubjective world of the
relationship between therapist and patient, Robert Aberg, Ph.D. observed that the benefit
of interpretation depends not on its objectivity or accuracy but on its ability to enhance
the co-created space between therapist and patient. It is not the accuracy of
interpretation but the attributions of therapist and patient that are important. All
behavior at all times is influenced by unconscious forces, and the therapist is in a
superior position only because he or she knows that. Neutrality and abstinence are always
conditional. The therapeutic space is co-created by conscious and unconscious forces of
therapist and patient and full of moments of finding and being found.
In his discussion, Ronald Schenk, Ph.D. drew
analogies between the analytic relationship and ideas drawn from myth, religion, and
science. First, he compared the classical analytic dialogue to an early Oedipus myth. In
the analytic dialogue, questions and answers focus on the past to learn about the present
situation, a situation comparable to Oedipus's blinding self analysis and realization of
what he had done. The intersubjective dialogue might be compared to a later Oedipus at
myth. Oedipus, blind and led by his daughters comes to a new city, looking for a good
place to die. The dialogue is not about the past but about what this place is. The search
for meaning is not in the past but in the present moment. The question is "What is
this place like?" Next, Dr. Schenk compared the analytic relationship to some of
Buber's ideas. Buber argued that God presents himself in authentic relationships. In the
relationship, something spiritual is going on; something larger than either person is at
work in the relationship. Finally, Dr. Schenk compared the evolution in psychoanalytic
paradigms to the evolution from earlier causal views to chaos theory. Chaos theory posits
that after a certain point, natural phenomena do not follow causal rules. Instead random
outcomes occur which follow a pattern but a pattern which cannot be predicted. What
determines the present is not just what happened in the past; the present is drawing the
event to it, looking for a pattern. Dr. Schenk likened this new aesthetic paradigm to the
intersubjective paradigm in psychoanalysis.
Rose Rothmeier, Ph.D. contributed a fanciful tale of
mythical characters to the evening's discussion. In her Myth of the Generic Therapist,
Narcissus fathers a child with Psyche, the wife of Eros. The child's name is Telos,
meaning aim, end, or fulfillment. She believes that she is the product of the soul
(Psyche) and desire (Eros), but has other influences in her lineage (Narcissus). Telos
looks for the point or purpose in events, assuming that events are directed at some goal.
Many seek her counsel; she uses her ability to perceive and convey purpose to alleviate
suffering. Thus, she represents the mythical picture of the therapist in Dr. Rothmeier's
lively imagination.
Sherry Lundberg, M.S., L.P.C. concluded the evening
with a discussion of the dynamic process, which occurred as the Program Committee worked
to develop this year's series of presentations.
Describing that process as something like therapy,
she recalled the complexity of the interactions and relationships that existed in those
moments in time. Finally, she described the good therapist as informed, responsible,
responsive, compassionate and not generic.
DIRECTORY ALERT
We go to press on October 15th for the
1998-1999 biannual DSPP Directory. All current members will be listed, along with a brief
description of areas of practice (limit 5-6 words). Directory information will be included
on our Web Page for those who are interested. For more information, call Sherry Lundberg,
M.S., L.P.C. at 214 340 2118.
ARTS COMMITTEE REPORT
The DSPP Arts Committee, chaired by Judith Samson,
Ph.D., has been hard at work and is offering an exciting series of events in the upcoming
months. In addition to Dr. Samson, the committee includes: Robert Aberg, Bill Barfoot,
Elena Blum, Salomon Grimberg, John Herman, Sandy Pitts, and Alice Van Huss.
Sunday, October 18, 5:00 PM
WILD STRAWBERRIES
Bergman's 1957 classic
An elderly professor reviews disappointments of his
life as he travels to receive an honorary degree
Alice Van Huss's House
14151 Montfort #335 Dallas, TX 75240
972-960-8409
Bring house number, needed to get in the gate.
Bring hors d'oeuvre, snack food. Drinks provided.
Sunday, October 25, 3:00-9:00 PM
VISUAL JAZZ!!!
Dallas photographer Joyce Sanders will display her
photographs, many of jazz musicians. The Robert
Aberg Trio and other Dallas area masters of jazz
improvisation will provide a jam session.
Cocktail Buffet
Robert and Sarah Aberg's Home
Sunday November 22, 4:00 PM
Cocktail Reception and Gallery Show
Wendy Faris
Pastel Chalk and Mexican Ribbon Spirit House
Paintings.
Gallery talk, based on
"Life Lines: Ribbons On and Off the Page"
in Confluencia.
Cultural and historical tradition of spirit houses
and the psychological, literary origins of her very personal and moving work.
Sunday, December 6, 5:00 PM
THE WHOLE WIDE WORLD
Directed by Dan Ireland
Based on Novalyne Price's memoirs.
A poignant depiction of her complex relationship with
pulp fiction writer, Robert E. Howard
Sandy Pitts' House
5017 Swiss Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75214
214-826-0583
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Rachel's Daughters:
Searching for the Causes of Breast Cancer
A film by Allie Light and Irving Saraf
Lakewood Theater, October 12, 7:30 PM
Oscar winning filmmakers in attendance
Video Association of Dallas: 214-999-8999
Documentary follows women breast cancer activists on
personal mission to unearth the causes of breast cancer. Engaging detective story and
analysis of science and politics of this epidemic.
The North Texas Regional Chapter of
The Society for Personality Assessment
presents
Dr. Robert Lovitt
Wednesday, October 7, 7:30 PM
Green Oaks Hospital Conference Room
7808 Clodus Fields Drive
Dallas, TX 75251
Integration of History and Rorschach Assessment Data
in a Child Custody Case
|